NEWYou can now listen to Fox information articles!
Actress Amber Heard's "performance" on the stand final week — it's what Johnny Depp's prison crew has known as it — has been commonly panned. but that can also no longer be satisfactory to give her ex-husband Depp a victory in his defamation case towards her, experts advised Fox information Digital.
Trial consultant and body language professional Susan Constantine analyzed Heard's flip within the witness container and gave her a thumbs down for believability.
"She isn't honest and most of what she's saying is a lie," Constantine spoke of in her estimation.
"here is such bad acting, I don't know how she's going to get a movie role after this."
"here is such dangerous acting, I have no idea how she's going to get a film role after this," pointed out trial advisor and physique language skilled Susan Constantine
Amber Heard testifying may additionally 5, 2022, towards ex-husband Johnny Depp. (Jim Lo Scalzo/Pool by the use of Reuters)
Depp, 58, is suing Heard, 36, for $50 million over a 2018 op-ed she wrote within the Washington post choosing herself as "a public figure representing home abuse."
although the piece didn't reference Depp by name, he claims it destroyed his career and grew to become him right into a Hollywood pariah.
JOHNNY DEPP V. AMBER HEARD DEFAMATION TRIAL: live UPDATES
Heard is countersuing for $a hundred million, accusing Depp and his former lawyer of conspiring to defame her by calling her abuse allegations a "hoax."
Heard spent two days on the stand closing week chronicling Depp's alleged acts of verbal, actual and sexual abuse that she says left her with a damaged nostril, black eyes and bruises.
Amber Heard testifying may 4, 2022, at Johnny Depp's defamation trial against her. (Elizabeth Frantz/Pool/Reuters)
In agonizing element, Heard described how Depp allegedly raped her with a bottle of Maker's Mark in a drug-fueled rage on a visit to Australia in March 2015.
however many critics have called out her tearless sobbing and melodramatic tone as inauthentic.
Heard's facial expressions and physique movements are incongruent and so exaggerated as to be "off the scales," Constantine pointed out. She brought that the "Aquaman" superstar recounts too many extraneous details that trauma victims usually wouldn't be aware — particularly six or more years after the truth.
JOHNNY DEPP V. AMBER HEARD: THE stunning TRIAL'S WILDEST MOMENTS
"Liars provide you with too a great deal counsel," she pointed out.
but that doesn't suggest that every thing Heard has said isn't authentic, Constantine mentioned.
"I feel that after she described the headbutt, she was being fair," she pointed out, relating to Heard's allegation that Depp launched his head into her and choked her unconscious all the way through an 2015 argument at their penthouse.
evidence pictures displaying accidents Johnny Depp sustained after ex-spouse Amber Heard allegedly slugged him in the face in March 2015. (evidence pictures)
"I do suppose he changed into verbally degrading from time to time," she added.
First amendment attorney George Freeman, director of the Media law aid center, observed that Depp has a steep hill to climb to win the case. The "Black Mass" actor has to show not handiest that Heard's statements are false however that she knew they were false when she made them, Freeman mentioned.
"When a public figure sues, it's a great deal greater intricate to win," observed First amendment lawyer George Freeman
He also has to persuade the jury that her accusations definitely damaged his recognition.
"When a public figure sues, it be an awful lot extra problematic to win," Freeman explained. "He has to show what was going on interior her head, that she knew she became mendacity."
evidence pictures displaying Amber Heard with a black eye, an alleged broken nostril and a clump of her hair on the floor. (proof photographs)
a private person most effective has to prove negligence or carelessness to prevail in a defamation case.
Heard's legal professional, Ben Rottenborn, has argued that Depp additionally has to show that Heard was basically regarding him in the op-ed. If he does, the jury simplest has to locate that Depp verbally abused Heard as soon as for him to lose his defamation case, the attorney has stated.
but civil and matrimonial attorney Marilyn Chinitz disagreed, countering that the op-ed certainly referenced Depp and a domestic violence declare Heard publicly made towards him two years prior.
Johnny Depp and Amber Heard in courtroom. (Evelyn Hockstein/Pool by the use of AP)
The "London Fields" star, with bruises on her face and paparazzi in tow, went to a los angeles courthouse to attain a restraining order in opposition t Depp in may additionally 2016, accusing him of bashing her in the eye with a cellular telephone.
"It's a transparent line of asserting that Depp abused her bodily however she didn't use his name," she stated.
Chinitz brought that the case will come down to the move-examination of Heard and whether Depp's criminal crew can undermine her to the point that the jury won't credit score any part of her testimony.
The trial in Fairfax County Circuit courtroom in Virginia went darkish this week for a pre-scheduled smash however will resume Monday with Heard returned on the witness stand. After her testimony wraps, her lawyers plan to call Depp returned to the stand in addition to his ex-lady friend, Ellen Barkin, and Amber's sister, Whitney Heard, however no longer necessarily in that order, in line with a supply near her team.
both sides have accused every other of actual and verbal abuse and offered witnesses, audio recordings and images which have bolstered their respective claims.
Actor Johnny Depp and wife Amber Heard attend the red carpet experience for the movie "Black Mass" on the 72nd Venice film festival in northern Italy September four, 2015. (Manuel Silvestri by the use of Reuters)
Depp, who has called Heard the abuser in their relationship, testified that she hurled a vodka bottle at him, severing the tip of his finger all the way through an notorious Australia blowup in 2015.
"I feel they've both damaged themselves in this lawsuit," pointed out Chinitz, who represented Tom Cruise and Michael Douglas of their respective divorces. "You don't get a positive feeling about either of them."
Heard's countersuit, alleging that Depp defamed her through calling her abuse declare a hoax, suffers from similar limitations, said crook and civil legal professional Mark Bederow.
click on here TO GET THE FOX news APP
Heard's crew need to show that Depp, no longer his lawyer, was truly behind the disparaging remark.
"however however one birthday party prevails, it could be a pyrrhic victory," Bederow advised Fox news Digital. "each of their reputations had been severely damaged on the general public stage."
Post a Comment